data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fb63/9fb639d1988edd87e4a526e2c2ef5dc07e2fd563" alt=""
They claim you can tell it's Brett because he's wearing the same wristwatch he wore at his first retirement press conference.
Con: It's probably not Brett because hundreds of men probably have the same watch.
Pro: It could be Brett because the watch's big hand is on the 12 and it’s little hand is...throwing an interception.
The woman he reportedly sent the pictures to was a sports reporter.
Con: It's probably not Brett because there were never any reports of him sending pictures of his penis to sports reporters when he was in Green Bay.
Pro: It could be Brett because if Larry McCarren had received a picture of a twisted, fleshy appendage he probably would have assumed it was a photo of his own finger.
In one of the photos Brett is reportedly masturbating.
Pro: It could be Brett because he is kind of a jerk off.
Con: It's probably not Brett, since we've only heard about him having a cannon for an arm, not a penis.
The pictures were supposedly sent while Brett was a member of the New York Jets.
Pro: It could be Brett because he did have regular interaction with the woman in question during that period.
Con: It's probably not Brett because if he was with the Jets and not Minnesota at the time, why does the penis in the picture reportedly have a purple helmet?
One of the pictures reportedly shows Brett groping his genitals.
Pro: It could be Brett because it reportedly does look like it could be his hand.
Con: It's probably not Brett because he’s only holding his balls not throwing them to an opponent’s defensive back.
No comments:
Post a Comment